Mayor Lim: miserably unrepentant by ELLEN TORDESILLAS

September 27, 2010

Manila Mayor Alfredo Lim has become a pathetic figure – a far cry from the anti-crime crusading character that earned for him the compliment “Dirty Harry”, the alias of the fictional character of San Francisco policeman, Harold Francis Callahan, played in several films by Clint Eastwood.

IIRC recommended harshest sanction on Lim

In recommending administrative and criminal proceedings, the IIRC held Lim liable for “assuming the authority of the on-scene commander in negotiations and tactical action… for negligence in his failure to organize and constitute the CMC (crisis management committee), for issuing an illegal order the arrest of Gregorio Mendoza, for abandoning and ordering the on-scene commander to abandon the Advance Command Post at the height of the hostage crisis and, in general, for failure to perform his duties as CMC Chairman… constituting dereliction of duty and gross negligence.”

“Dirty Harry” endeared himself to the audience by stomping on the inept bureaucracy, even taking the law in his hands, to give justice to the underprivileged.

Lim became a legend when he cleared known criminal havens of undesirable elements. For that, he was rewarded a political career after he retired from the police service. He was manila mayor from 1992 to 1998 and senator from 2004 to 2007. He returned as Manila mayor in 2007 and got re-elected last May.

One would think that with his long years as local chief executive, Lim would have handled the Aug. 23 hostage incident with competence and wisdom. What we saw was “utak pulbura” at work.

He has never admitted mistake for the debacle that claimed the lives of eight Hongkong tourists and strained relations with China and its prosperous administrative region, which hosts thousands of Filipino workers.

The IIRC , in fact, put the blame squarely on him. The committee, headed by Justice Secretary Leila de Lima, listed eight incidents that turned the crisis into a tragedy. Lim had a role in almost all of those incidents.

The first incident was the non-activation of the crisis management committee. “Mayor Alfredo Lim of the City of Manila was the person in authority charged with the duty of activating the CMC,” the committee said.

The committee criticized the attention given by authorities concerned to SPO2 Gregorio Mendoza, brother of hostage-taker,former Senior Inspector Rolando Mendoza as co-conspirator and accessory.

“Whether he was shouting or not is not really material. The fact is Col. Yebra (the negotiator) displayed his loss of focus on the task at hand. He was distracted by a peripheral matter,” the committee said.

“More important to addressing the actuations of Gregorio was re-building the confidence of Mendoza, re-establishing contact with him, and salvaging the negotiations that clearly broke down, by working on the offered alternative solution. Instead, Col. Yebra, Mayor Lim, Gen. Magtibay, and other police officers present focused on handling the peripheral matter involving Gregorio resulting to Mayor Lim’s order for Gregorio’s arrest, looking for handcuffs, and conferring on how to handle Gregorio. By attending to the peripheral matter, precious time to salvage the negotiations, already critical at this late hour of the crisis situation, was lost. The windows of opportunity were closing,” the report further said.

The committee noted that the arrest of SPO2 Gregorio Mendoza, upon orders of Mayor Lim, “s was the proximate cause of the chain of events that led to Mendoza’s shooting at the hostages.”

The report said:” The potential adverse reaction of Mendoza to an arrest of Gregorio was not lost to Mayor Lim. This is borne by his instruction to the escorting officers to use the back door of the Advance Command Post to avoid media. That Mendoza was viewing television at this time was already known at this point. The instruction to avoid media should be taken in this context.

“Given the tenuous situation, i.e., negotiations having broken down, adding a potential irritant to Mendoza with the arrest of his brother was a lack or absence of sound judgment.”

The committee also cited the departure of Mayor Lim and General Magtibay from the Advance Command Post at a crucial time.

“The absence of Mayor Lim and General Magtibay in the Advance Command Post created a vacuum in command or decision makers. This resulted in the inability of those present to handle crisis events as they unfolded. Everything that Mayor Lim and General Magtibay hoped to accomplish at Emerald Restaurant, including taking a meal, could have been accomplished at the Advance Command Post and even better because they would have been in a position to react to events promptly.

“The most significant of events that transpired after Mayor Lim and General Magtibay left the Advance Command Post were the coverage of Gregorio being arrested, the deadlines being given by Mendoza before he starts shooting the hostages and the actual shooting of hostages.”

When told last Monday about his inclusion among those to be sanctioned as recommended by the Incident Investigating and Review Committee that looked into the tragedy, Lim said he was “insulted.”

Lim is hopeless. It’s now up to Aquino to save the Filipino people from government officials like Lim.

Manila Mayor Alfredo Lim was driven to tears Tuesday while defending policemen even as he criticized his inclusion in the list of officials deemed responsible for the hostage mess.

“You cannot rely on anybody except policemen and soldiers who are paid to die. No other professional will offer to sacrifice their lives for you … Every time they step out of their homes, one foot is buried in the ground,” an emotional Lim said, pounding a closed fist on his table at the Manila City Hall.

Lim likened the IIRC report to a “shotgun blast.”

“Everyone who was there was hit.”

“Who of you here will willingly die in the performance of your duty? No one. Only the police. And yet what are we getting into? Blame and keep blaming the police. Let’s place things in its proper perspective. What do we stand to get from keeping up the blame game?” Lim said in a news conference.

The mayor denied responsibility for the bloodbath, insisting that he performed his role “to the letter and to the best of his ability under the circumstances.”

Lim defended his decision to leave the command post at the height of crucial negotiations to eat at Emerald Garden restaurant and denied that it constituted abandonment of his duties as the chair of the crisis management committee.

***

Lim bears brunt of recommended sanctions in hostage crisis
Malaya

The Incident Investigation and Review Committee has recommended that administrative and criminal proceedings be opened against Manila Mayor Alfredo Lim, the harshest directed at 12 persons tagged as having responsibility for the bungled hostage rescue attempt that resulted in the death of eight Hong Kong tourists and the hostage taker on August 23.

It said his actions during the hostage crisis constitute dereliction of duty and gross negligence under the Local Government Code (RA 7160.

The specific recommendations of the IIRC have not been publicly released.

It said administrative proceedings should be opened against five senior police officials and Interior Secretary Rico Puno. It recommended that a preliminary investigation be conducted on their possible criminal liability.

It held Manila Vice Mayor Francisco “Isko Moreno” Domogoso administratively liable but was silent on his possible criminal liability.

It said further investigation should be conducted against Ombudsman Merceditas Gutierrez to determine whether her offenses qualify as grounds for impeachment.

On Deputy Ombudsman Emilion Gonzales, the IIRC said the Office of the President should determine possible administrative offenses.

The panel said it is referring the results of the investigation of broadcasters Michael Rogas and Erwin Tulfo to the Kapisanan ng mga Brodkaster ng Pilipinas for their possible sanctions for violations of the Code of Ethics.

The IIRC said that against ABC 5, ABS-CBN and GMA7, the results should be endorsed to the KBP, or appropriate media “watchdog” organizations, for possible violations of their Code of Ethics.

In recommending administrative and criminal proceedings, the IIRC held Lim liable for “assuming the authority of the on-scene commander in negotiations and tactical action… for negligence in his failure to organize and constitute the CMC (crisis management committee), for issuing an illegal order the arrest of Gregorio Mendoza, for abandoning and ordering the on-scene commander to abandon the Advance Command Post at the height of the hostage crisis and, in general, for failure to perform his duties as CMC Chairman… constituting dereliction of duty and gross negligence.”

On the reference to the arrest of Mendoza, brother of hostage taker Rolando Mendoza, the “Highlights” of the IIRC report said: “There is evidence to support the finding that what Mayor Lim actually ordered was the summary execution of Gregorio Mendoza when, in conjunction with the order to arrest… he also instructed the MPD officials present… that Gregorio be ‘brought to Tondo,’ a euphemism for summary execution…”

The grounds cited by IIRC against Chief Supt. Rodolfo Magtibay, ground commander and relieved Manila police chief, were serious irregularities in the performance of duties and gross incompetence; Director Leocadio Santiago Jr., former National Capital Region chief, “less grave” neglect of duty; PNP chief Jesus Verzosa, “less grave” neglect of duty; Puno, gross negligence; negotiator Supt. Orlando Yerba, negligence, and; Insp. Santiago Pascual III, assault team leader, gross incompetence.

Malacanang allayed fears of a whitewash in the investigation of the August 23 hostage crisis following President Aquino’s decision not to release as yet the recommendations of the Incident Investigation and Review Committee (IIRC) and to have them reviewed by his own legal panel.

Aquino said Monday a review by Executive Secretary Paquito Ochoa Jr. and chief presidential legal counsel Eduardo de Mesa is necessary because the IIRC report did not make specific recommendations on which persons should be charged with what crime.

(The “Recommendations” portion of the report which has yet to be released belies this. The recommended charges were specific to each person.)

He also said he may uphold some recommendations, or add to or subtract from them.

Presidential spokesman Edwin Lacierda said releasing the recommendations would have an impact on the lives and reputation of the individuals cited in the report.

“Gusto ng Pangulo na he would be able to support everything in the report. That’s why he wants to study the report. Because first and foremost, let me emphasize, the report is recommendatory in nature,” he said.

“Kapag inilabas kung ano ang magiging pag-aaral po ng Chief Presidential Legal Counsel at ng Office of the Executive Secretary, ilalahad po iyong dalawa. So, wala po tayong itatago, ilalabas po natin iyong dalawang iyon in fairness to those people named,” he added.

Lacierda said Aquino has great confidence in Justice Secretary Leila de Lima, head of the IIRC, and her work but the President does not want to make hasty decisions.

“The report is recommendatory, so the final decision rests on the President. Kaya nais niyang maging maayos po ang kaniyang decision sa pag-aaral po ng IIRC report at ang mga recommendation doon sa report,” he said.

He said there is no need for the officials named in the IIRC report to go on leave.

Lacierda said unlike the partial report released by Malacañang to the public on Monday afternoon, the government gave the full IIRC report to the Chinese government through its embassy in Manila a few hours earlier.

He said Chinese Ambassador Liu Jianchao replied positively to Foreign Affairs Undersecretary Esteban Conejos, who delivered the report to the Chinese embassy.

He said Hong Kong authorities are conducting a separate investigation but he is not aware if it was finished.

Inhibition

Lima said the panel’s recommendation was basically to initiate administrative proceedings for specific administrative offenses under applicable rules of the National Police Commission (Napolcom) and the PNP and the Local Government code, and/or preliminary investigation for possible criminal liability arising from the acts or omissions as determined by the IIRC, or further investigation or referral to appropriate venues.

She also said she is willing to inhibit herself from reviewing any case that may reach the Department of Justice against those who would be charged in connection with the hostage crisis.

This is to allay perception of prejudgment.

She said there is a big possibility the DOJ will be tasked to handle the charges.

“The option to inhibit is always there…Due process must be observed and we cannot be the judge and jury at the same time,” De Lima said.

De Lima also asked President Aquino not to “absolve or exclude” personalities the IIRC recommended charged, and appealed for “minor” changes in report.

“Since under review nga by the President through his legal team, there may be changes there. But on the part of IIRC sana kung mayroon mang changes it would just be minor. Yun bang babawasan lang ng konti ang culpability o dadagdagan yung culpability. Hindi yung outright exclusion o absolution of certain personalities,” De Lima said at the Senate where she attended the hearing of the proposed DOJ budget.

She further defended the report’s “open-ended” recommendation on the liabilities of those included in the report.

“Talagang open-ended yung sa criminal proceedings because of lack of time sa evaluation and study ng committee. Hindi pa namin masyado mai-ugnay o hindi pa namin clear na ma-indicate or specify ang specific charge. So it’s an open-ended recommendation with respect to the criminal proceedings,” she said.

Report welcomed

China welcomed the submission but said it has yet to dissect the IIRC 83-page report, citing its length.

“The initial reading indicates that the Philippine side takes a sincere and serious manner in handling with and looking into the incident, to which the Chinese side expresses its appreciation,” said Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Jiang Yu in a statement released by the Chinese Embassy.

“Since it is a long report, the Chinese side does need time for a careful study,” the official added.

Jiang renewed calls for the prevention of similar incidents.

“We hope that the Philippine side takes effective measures to strengthen protection of the Chinese personnel in the Philippines and prevent the reoccurrence of similar tragedies,” said Jiang.

Jiang added that China is always ready to continue the further advancement of the relations between the two countries “in a sound and steady manner.”

‘Situation room’

Lacierda also said because of the hostage crisis, government is revising its crisis management manual and is cobbling up a “situation room” to monitor future crises. He said the new manual would be released soon.

“We have the manual. We have the resources. We have the forces to deal with any incident such as hostage taking,” he said.

He said National Security Adviser Cesar Garcia will head the situation room.

A “war room” was set up inside Malacañang by President Arroyo in 2004, following the kidnapping of Filipino overseas worker Angelo de la Cruz in Iraq. It was headed by former military colonel Victor Corpus.

The small facility, which was shown to Palace reporters, contained monitoring equipment such as telephones, several television screens dedicated to important news sources, computers and other telecommunications equipment.

Lacierda said the “war room” has been dismantled.

Verzosa ready

Verzosa, through lawyer Benjamin de los Santos, said is ready to face any charge.

Delos Santos expressed confidence his client, who is out of the country, will have no liability.

“We followed the manual and standards and international protocols on hostage situation, and if you have time to read and really analyze the report of the IIRC, they themselves admitted that it is difficult to determine authority due to inadequacy of the manual,” he said.

Delos Santos said the principle of command responsibility does not apply to Verzosa since the buck stops at Magtibay’s immediate superior. Santiago.

Verzosa was at Cagayan de Oro City at the height of the hostage drama and could not immediately fly back to Manila since there were no more flights available that time. He went on early retirement last week.

Con games

The Office of the Ombudsman questioned the basis for the recommendation on Gutierrez and Gonzalez.

Deputy Ombudsman Mark Jalandoni and Assistant Ombudsman Jose de Jesus clarified that Gutierrez never promised the hostage-taker, dismissed Supt. Rolando Mendoza, that he will be reinstated.

They stressed that Mendoza accepted the Ombudsman’s commitment to personally review the case which led to his dismissal.

“Mendoza knew very well that the Ombudsman cannot possibly grant his request that same day. There was no confusion; Mendoza had a crystal clear understanding of what was promised to him. After their phone conversation, he even released one of the hostages as a proof of good faith and acceptance,” Jalandoni pointed out.

As to suggestions that the Ombudsman should have readily agreed to reinstate Mendoza to save the lives of hostages, the two officials explained that the anti-graft body cannot be party to such a deception.

“We are not here to play con games or to compromise with criminals. Doing so would damage the irreversibly damage the credibility of this office. The Office of the Ombudsman is not part of the negotiation; we have no expertise about such matters. We only did our job according to the letter of the law,” De Jesus said.

The two likewise questioned the tone of the IIRC report which they said tended to portray Mendoza as a martyred hero rather than a former police officer who went rogue to force the government to give in to his demands.

“From what we read, the report seemed to depict the hostage-taker as a hero rather than a former lawman who chose to be a criminal. Mendoza betrayed his sworn duty to uphold and protect the law and brought shame to our country,” De Jesus added.

New investigation

At the same press conference, the two officials announced that the anti-graft body will begin today its own investigation centering exclusively on the botched rescue operations.

Jalandoni said Gutierrez has created a special panel of field investigators to be led by Assistant Ombudsman Joselito Fangon. The team was given 30 days to submit its findings.

The new probe was launched at the request of HK-Special Administrative Region, Southern District councilors Henry Chai Man Hon and Andrew Fung Wai Kwong who wrote to Gutierrez last August 24.

De Jesus said their office received the letter last September 16 but the Ombudsman allowed the IIRC to complete its own investigation out of respect to the directives of President Aquino.

Jalandoni said testimonies and other evidence gathered by the IIRC will become part of the Ombudsman’s investigation and will be considered in its independent review of evidence “to prevent duplication.”

He stressed that the investigation will focus solely on the police conduct of the rescue operations at the request of the HK-SAR officials to determine the readiness of police operatives, accuracy of threat assessment by police officials and whether the ground commander made the correct call in not shooting Mendoza when he exposed himself outside the bus several times.

Lim blames Mendoza’s brother

Lim, in a pres conference, blew his top as he lashed at the IIRC for including him and Moreno among those recommended to be charged.

Lim said that contrary to the findings of the IIRC, he did not abandon his duty as head of the crisis management committee.

The mayor instead put the blame on SPO2 Gregorio Mendoza, brother of the hostage-taker, for egging the latter to not to agree to the offers of negotiators unless his service firearm was released by the MPD, thus, laying the groundwork for his brother to lose his confidence in the negotiations.

He recounted that Gregorio admitted before him and the other officers present at the advance command post (ACP) that he had knowledge of his brother’s plans. Yet, Lim said, there appeared to be no mention of Gregorio in the IIRC report.

“Baligtad na ba ang mundo?” he said.

Reacting to the portion of the report stating that Lim should have had his meal at the ACP instead of at the Emerald Restaurant, Lim said: “Gaano ba kalayo ang Emerald sa bus? Eh mas malayo pa ang MPD headquarters sa UN Avenue kung saan nandun ang ibang opisyal ng gobyerno. There is no abandonment that took place because all the key officials of the MPD remained at the ACP.”

Aside from Magtibay, the mayor said all the key MPD officers were at the post including the deputies, station commander and the one in charge of public affairs.

Meanwhile, lawyer Harry Roque, who heads Centerlaw, a group of lawyers advocating human rights and press freedom, expressed disappointment at the IIRC recommendation to charge the media, saying bad journalism is not synonymous to criminal conduct.

“While we acknowledge that media may have failed to observe the highest degree of professionalism and self-restraint in their coverage of the unfortunate incident, still this is not a basis for holding them liable for breach of the country’s criminal laws. Bad journalism is not and should never be criminal in a democracy,” he said in a statement. – Regina Bengco, Evangeline de Vera, JP Lopez, Gerard Naval, Peter Tabingo and Raymond Africa


TINGOG.COM THE VOICE OF A FILIPINO: PROVEN WRONG, ALFREDO LIM’S SON OUT OF JAIL

April 20, 2010

I’m not above saying that I am wrong. And in the case of Alfredo Lim’s son, Manuel Lim, and his “alleged” involvement in a drug buy-bust operation, in which he “sold drugs”, I had first thought that Alfredo Lim’s “hands off” approach was a noteworthy sign that Alfredo Lim stood by his principles. Until that is, a few days ago, when his son was able to post bail, in the amount of P400,000. In which, in normal circumstances, it is impossible to post such a bail. And after a few blunt remarks from readers, I had to address this story.

Many of men, have been put behind bars for life, for much lesser circumstances, and yet, Lim’s son, Manuel Lim, a “known” drug user, who in a drug bust, went inside a car where money was exchanged, drugs were exchanged, is now out on bail. Such a serious crime, deserves no bail, especially when drugs plays such a devastating role in our society. I know first hand, what drugs can do to an entire community, when the result is murder, and the death of an innocent individual.

Atty. Bagatsing: Did you personally see the transaction inside the car?

Arresting Officer: No Sir. I only have knowledge that they have boarded.

Are they kidding us? What the hell do they expect us to think they did in the car? Give each other blowjobs?

And according to Atty. Bagatsing, because the backside of Manuel’s hands also had fluorescent powder from the marked money, that it can’t be possible for Manuel to have handled the money. What he doesn’t mention that both sides had the powder! I don’t know about this Attorney, but trust me, when you handle money, powder will eventually get on everything, and just touching your hands together is enough to have the powder spread.

And yes, of course, there is no evidence that Alfredo Lim had any involvement in the release of his son, and Lim is denying that he had a hand in it as well. But let’s be honest people, let’s really step back and decipher it for ourselves. When the father is as powerful as Alfredo Lim, and in a case like this, can we really believe Alfredo Lim?

But, this is besides the point, according to the Dangerous Drugs Act, anyone caught with more than 50 grams of shabu cannot post bail. Manuel had around 100 grams of Shabu.

I may have been wrong before, because maybe of my need to see the good in Alfredo Lim, but maybe I was too quick to commit such an act of faith. Shame on me I guess. I bet every damn drug dealer, pusher, and user, wishes they had Alfredo Lim as their father.

Such a despicable act of hypocrisy. And we wonder why, drugs, murder, and corruption still pervades our country. And why Mayor’s talk tough when it comes to drugs only to garner pogi points for elections. Manuel Lim, let’s get this guy off the streets! Alfredo Lim, let’s get this guy out of government!

http://www.tingog.com/politics/proven-wrong-alfredo-lims-son-out-of-jail.html


Ombudsman wants Manila Mayor Alfredo Lim, Vice-Mayor Isko Moreno, 20 others probed on sale of Century Parkr

April 2, 2010

Ombudsman wants Lim, Moreno, 20 others probed on sale of Century Park

By Charlie V. Manalo
The Daily Tribune
03/31/2010

The Office of the Ombudsman has ordered a probe of Manila Mayor Alfredo Lim, Vice Mayor Isko Moreno along with 20 city councilors and several officials for the alleged rigged sale of a five-star hotel in Manila.

According to Assistant Ombudsman Jose de Jesus, Ombudsman spokesman, they will now evaluate the case against Lim and the other officials of Manila and proceed accordingly with the rules of their office.

The Ombudsman official said after evaluating the case, if warranted, they will proceed with the preliminary investigation of the case to determine if there is probable cause to indict them criminally before the Sandiganbayan or they could be found administratively liable.

“We will evaluate and proceed accordingly (with the investigation) and if warranted we will proceed with the official investigation of the case,” De Jesus said.

He added Lim and the other officials could still be subjected to preventive suspension despite the existing election ban in imposing penalties on government officials because the case filed against Lim and the Manila officials is graft.

It was pointed out that as a general rule, the Office of the Ombudsman could no longer impose sanctions during the election period but the only exception is when the crime committed involves graft and corruption.

“As a general rule bawal ng mag-suspend. But in this case covered yan ng suspension if evidence warrant after the conduct of a proper investigation since the crime involved is graft,” De Jesus said.

The case was already docketed by the Office of the Ombudsman.

In a 24-page Complaint-Affidavit earlier filed by lawyer Reynaldo Bagatsing, Lim and the Manila officials were charged for violating section 3e and g of Republic Act 3019 or the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act for causing undue injury to the government and to private bidders after the sale of the land where Century Park Hotel stands.

Aside from Lim and Moreno or Francisco Dumagoso in real life, also included in the charge sheet were Bids and Awards Committee chairman and secretary to the mayor Rafaelito Garayblas, along with BAC members Lourdes Manlulu, Thelma Perez, Alicia Moscaya, Roberto Amores, Racquel Acosta and Ronald Siojo.

Councilors charged with graft were Moises Lim, Erick Ian Nieva, Arlene Koa, Ernesto Dionisio Jr., Carlo Lopez, Rolando Valeriano, Ernesto Isip Jr., Yul Servo, Maira Sheila Lacuna-Pangan, Luisito Chua, Edward Maceda, Victoriano Melendez, Roderick Valbuena, Raymundo Yupangco, Josefina Siscar, Ernesto Rivera, Danilo Victor Lacuna and Russel Ibay.

The officials were also charged for violating the Local Government Code for giving undue preference to a private party and entering into a contract without the benefit of public bidding.

It was alleged in the complaint that on Sept. 16, 2008 a public bidding was conducted but they announced that it is a failed bidding. The property covered is the real property of Century Park Hotel owned by the City of Manila which is 45,680 square meters.

Bidding was repeated on Sept. 30, 2008 after publication and two bidders participated, namely, Maranaw Hotels and Restaurant Corp. which submitted a bid of P1 billion and AM Oreta and Co. Inc. which tendered a bid of P997,300,000.

Bagatsing argued that Lim, Moreno and the other officials committed criminal acts when they disposed the two parcels of land through a rigged bidding after passing City Council Resolution 176 Series of 2008 which “authorized City Mayor Alfredo Lim to enter into a negotiated sale of the property of the City of Manila.”

This was followed by a malicious notice and defective Notice of Public Auction questionable proceedings of the Committee on Awards of the City of Manila. The three-day notice given in the newspapers of the sale is not fair and equal chance to participate in the public auction.

It was also stated that supplementary contract entered into by and between the City of Manila and Tourist Trade and Travel Corporation on Aug. 1, 2003 clearly shows that the market value of the improvements (Century Park Hotel) is already valued at P1 billion.

It was stated in the final appraisal report the entire property will command an aggregate value of P1,705,339,637, resulting in a deficit of at least P705,339,537.


Graft raps filed vs Manila Mayor Alfredo Lim and Vice-Mayor Isko Moreno for P1B sale of Century Park Hotel

March 2, 2010

Graft raps filed vs Lim, Isko for P1B sale of Century Park Hotel
by People’s Tonight
Monday, 01 March 2010 20:13

GRAFT charges were filed yesterday before the Office of the Ombudsman against Manila Mayor Alfredo S. Lim, Vice Mayor Francisco “Isko Moreno” Domagoso, 20 councilors, four other city officials and four John Does for the allegedly fraudulent bidding and sale of the Century Park Hotel at a bargain price of P 1billion.

Atty. Reynaldo L. Bagatsing, erstwhile legal adviser of Lim and former close friend, pointed out in a 26-page complaint that the transaction should be nullified and the perpetrators penalized as it is “manifestly and grossly disadvantageous to the City of Manila. The Century Park Hotel is a five-star crown jewel of the city government and sits on a 4.5 hectare prime property that could easily fetch a P 3 billion price tag.”

Bagatsing also noted that on paper, as reflected by documents obtained from the City Assessor’s Office, the land alone occupied by the hotel at the “mysteriously reduced area of 22, 967 square meters is already worth P 965,261,850 or almost P1 billion. This is not the actual market value because the zonal valuation of the land made by the Bureau of Internal Revenue was conducted in 2005 in addition to the fact that present selling price of prime properties in the Malate-Ermita district ranges from P 50,000 to P 80,000 per square meter.”

The hotel building, Bagatsing pointed out, underwent an upgrading or renovation works few years ago undertaken by the Tourist Trade and Travel Corporation, the original lease holder, at a cost of P 1 billion as reflected in a supplementary contract it entered into with the city government. “This clearly shows that the hotel building alone and the improvements thereat is worth more than P 1 billion.”

Records show that the winning bidder, which now owns Century Park Hotel, and the 4.5 hectare land it occupies is Maranaw Hotels and Resort Corporation which submitted a P1 billion bid. The firm is publicly known to be owned by business tycoon Lucio Tan. Tan’s firm actually obtained the rights to operate the hotel in 2003 from Tourist Trade and Travel Corporation of the Martel family.

Tan is not yet named in the graft complaint pending verification of documents, instead four “John Does” were listed, Bagatsing said. Only lawyer Melissa Saez Co, who represented Maranaw Hotels & Resort Corporation in the bidding, was included in the charge sheet. Aside from Lim and Vice Mayor Domagoso, also named as respondents were Secretary to the Mayor Rafaelito Garayblas, chairman of the bid and awards committee; Maria Lourdes Manlulu, Alicia T. Moscaya and Thelma Perez, members.

Twenty councilors were also included in the complaint for their role in granting Mayor Lim the authority to negotiate the sale of the hotel through City Council Resolution No. 176 adopted on August 5, 2008 and for affirming or ratifying the award and sale to the Tan firm through Resolution No. 278 approved on December 23, 2008. The councilors include Moises Lim, Erick Ian Nieva, Arlene Koa, Ernesto Dionesio,Jr., Carlo Lopez, Rolando Valeriano, Ernesto isip,Jr., John Martin Nieto (the actor known as Yul Servo), Maria Shiela Lacuna-Pangan, Luisito Chua, Edward Maceda, Victoriano Melendez, Roderick Valbuena, Raymundo Yupangco, Josefina Siscar, Ernesto Rivera, Danilo Victor Lacuna, Luciano Veloso, Philip Lacuna and Russel Ibay.

Bagatsing stressed that while it pains him to sue Lim because the mayor was formerly a close friend but find it necessary and an obligation as a taxpayer and Manila resident to bring him and his cohorts before the bar justice. “It is certainly the duty of every citizen to protect their rights. Public interest dictates that Lim should be made to answer for a wrongful act.”

At the same time Bagatsing also challenged the political opponents of Lim to issue a public commitment and assurance that should they win in the forthcoming 2010 elections, they will nullify the sale of the Century Park Hotel. “After recovery, the city government should proceed in disposing the property in a transparent and open public bidding,” he added.

The anti-graft crusader and lawyer also lamented the undue haste the sale of Century Park Hotel was undertaken. “There was evident rush in having it disposed in a period of only five months since August 5, 2008 when the City Council granted Lim the authority to negotiate the sale. It must be noted that the Committee on Bid and Awards immediately caused the publication on September 8 and 12, 2008 a notice of auction in the Philippine Star. The bidding was held September 16 with Garayblas presiding. He declared a failure of bidding because only Maranaw Hotel and Resort Corporation made an offer.

“On September 18 & 23, the Garayblas Committee again caused the publication of a second notice of public auction, also in the Philippine Star. But it contained factual errors so it also caused the publication of an erratum on September 27 clarifying that the sale involved two parcels of land occupied by the hotel and not 20 parcels as contained in the second notice of auction.

“The second auction was held September 30, 2008 with Maranaw Hotels and Resort Corporation offering a P 1billion bid and A. M. Oreta & Co., Inc. that presented the miraculously close bid of P997,300,000.00 or a hairline difference of only P 2,700,000.00. This was obviously a companion bid submitted few days before the September 30 second bidding,” Bagatsing pointed out.

He said the Ombudsman should also look into the mysterious reduction of the lot area actually occupied by hotel which is 45,689 square meters to only 22,967 square meters in the contract or a difference of 22, 722 square meters. “This could actually be a case of a clever attempt to reduce the price tag for the said property which clearly makes this transaction a sweetheart deal,” he added.


Atienza son claims harassment by Manila City Hall department heads

February 27, 2010

Atienza son claims harassment by Manila city hall department heads
By Nestor Etolle (The Philippine Star) Updated February 25, 2010 12:00 AM

MANILA, Philippines – Concerned Manila residents yesterday called on the police and other government agencies to look into the alleged harassment of City Hall personnel who tore down and removed posters of former Manila mayor Lito Atienza.

The residents, led by Atienza’s son Ali, enumerated before mediamen several incidents involving personnel from the City Hall’s Department of Public Safety who almost figured into clashes with supporters of the former mayor and secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources.

The young Atienza said that on Monday men on board an Elf van (SHP-763) tore down and removed information posters of Atienza at the Tanbunting area along Aurora Boulevard. The men were reportedly personnel from the DPS, which is headed by former policeman Caloy Baltazar, a known ally of Mayor Alfredo Lim.

The DPS men were warned by residents not to remove those posters since they were put on private properties and allowed by the house owners to show their support for Atienza, Ali said. However, the DPS men continued with the removal of the posters.

At around 10 a.m. along Honorio Lopez Blvd. in Tondo, another DPS truck (565) arrived and the men on board also removed Atienza posters, Ali said. The same was repeated along Quezon Boulevard in Quiapo past 2 p.m., Ali said.

DPS personnel and residents also clashed in Tondo yesterday when some irate residents broke the windshield of a DPS van. The residents observed that it was only Atienza’s posters that were being removed by the DPS men.

“I am only wondering why these DPS personnel are singling out the posters of my father,” Ali told mediamen.

The young Atienza said that the situation is not fair since Lim also has a lot of campaign materials posted in several places, and asked why Lim has not ordered the removal of his own posters and tarpaulins in Manila.

Ali said they are now gathering more evidence for the filing of appropriate charges on the DPS personnel and Baltazar before the Civil Service Commission. He also called on the police to remain vigilant on the streets to thwart an impending clash of DPS men and residents that could lead to loss of lives and properties.

Lim, Atienza and former Palace adviser on the peace process Avelino Razon will slug it out for the mayoralty race on May 10.

The STAR tried to get the reaction of Baltazar but was told he was not at his office attending to some commitments. – With Sandy Araneta


MANILA VICE-MAYOR ISKO MORENO: A TRUE POLITICAL BALIMBING

November 13, 2009

Lim-Isko tandem sa 2010
(Pilipino Star Ngayon) Updated November 10, 2009 12:00 AM

MANILA, Philippines – Pormal nang nagdeklara kahapon sina Manila Mayor Alfredo Lim at Vice Mayor Isko Moreno bilang running mates sa mayoralty race sa darating na 2010 election na ginanap sa Bonifacio Shrine, malapit sa Manila City Hall, Ermita Maynila, kahapon ng hapon.

Ang koalisyon ng political organization ni Lim, ang Laban para sa Kapayapaan, Katarungan at Kaunlaran o KKK at ni Sen. Noynoy Aquino III na Liberal Party ay pormal na naghayag ng pagsasanib pwersa at suporta sa isa’t-isa.

Sa harap ng tinatayang 50-libong tao na pawang nakasuot ng dilaw na t-shirts ay inihayag ni Lim ang todo suporta ng KKK kay Noynoy. Doon din isinagawa ang oath-taking ng pinakabagong miyembro ng KKK na si Isko Moreno bago pa ipinakilala nila ng alkalde ang partial list ng mga kandidato sa kongreso at city council.

Isa umanong ‘perfect match’ sila ni Moreno dahil kapwa sila nagmula sa kahirapan at taga-Maynila na kapwa may adhikaing ibigay ang edukasyon, health care at basic social services lalo na sa mga mahihirap na mamamayan. (Ludy Bermudo)

TWO DAYS LATER ……………………..

Isko takes oath as NP member
By Christina Mendez (The Philippine Star) Updated November 12, 2009 12:00 AM

Manila Vice Mayor Francisco ‘Isko’ Moreno takes his oath as a member of the Nacionalista Party headed by Sen. Manny Villar.

MANILA, Philippines – Manila Vice Mayor Francisco “Isko” Moreno drew the line on his allegiance and took his oath as the latest member of Nacionalista Party (NP) headed by Sen. Manny Villar.

The reelectionist Moreno, president of the local party Asenso Manileño, made the move following the announcement of his tandem with Manila Mayor Alfredo Lim at the Bonifacio Shrine last Monday. LP stalwarts led by its standard bearer Sen. Noynoy Aquino and his vice presidential candidate Mar Roxas presented Lim and Moreno as their candidates in Manila for the mayoralty and vice mayoralty bets for next year’s elections.

Also, Moreno is the “guest” vice mayoral candidate of former Presidential Peace Adviser Avelino “Sonny” Razon who is an official candidate for mayor in the city of Manila under the Nationalist People’s Coalition, However, Moreno said that contrary to claims by some quarters, he has not had any deal with Razon or any other mayoral candidate for that matter, saying that he and Lim have already agreed to run together way back, although they announced it publicly and formally only recently.

Those who attended Moreno’s oathtaking at the Laurel House in Mandaluyong City yesterday quoted the vice mayor as saying that he believes in Villar’s integrity, virtually abandoning any alliance with the Liberal Party.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.